Our Full Mandate

This document sets out the formal mandate of PIP Agency — what we are authorised and equipped to do, who we serve, the boundaries of our work, and how we hold ourselves accountable to the individuals and communities we assist.

Mandate Overview

Formal Mandate Statement

“The Private Investor Protection Agency is mandated to provide independent, structured, and impartial review services to individuals who have suffered financial loss through fraud, misconduct, or platform failure — operating without commercial interest in outcomes, without upfront fees at submission, and without discrimination by case size, jurisdiction, or claimant background.”

PIP Agency (PIPA) has operated under this mandate since its founding in 2009. The mandate was established in response to a structural gap in victim support services: the absence of any professional, accessible, and genuinely independent body dedicated exclusively to assisting private individuals recover funds lost through financial misconduct.

Unlike regulatory bodies, PIPA does not investigate or penalise financial firms. Unlike law firms, PIPA does not provide legal advice or representation. Our mandate is narrower and more specific: to provide every qualifying claimant with a credible, documented process for pursuing recovery of their funds — and to do so with full transparency at every stage.

Est. 2009 — Over 15 years of service

PIP Agency has operated continuously since 2009, reviewing more than 2,400 cases across 38 jurisdictions and assessing in excess of $180 million in reported claims.

What We Do

PIPA provides a structured, three-stage process for reviewing and advancing fund recovery claims on behalf of private individuals:

Stage 1 — Intake & Eligibility Review

Every submission is reviewed to assess eligibility, identify the type of loss involved, and determine the appropriate review track. Claimants are notified within 2 business days of receipt and may be contacted for additional information at this stage.

Stage 2 — Case Processing & Documentation

Verified cases are assigned to a specialist reviewer with relevant jurisdictional and case-type expertise. The review includes documentation analysis, case structuring, and coordination with third parties where applicable. Claimants receive written updates at each checkpoint.

Stage 3 — Outcome Communication & Recovery Coordination

Claimants are informed of all outcomes and available recovery pathways in writing. Where recovery options exist, PIPA coordinates the necessary steps and provides ongoing case management until closure or escalation.

Services provided under mandate

  • Independent case intake and eligibility assessment
  • Documentation review and structured case file preparation
  • Jurisdictional analysis and regulatory pathway identification
  • Coordination with relevant financial authorities, ombudsman offices, and legal channels
  • Written case updates and outcome communication at every stage
  • Ongoing case management through to resolution or closure

Who We Help

PIPA's mandate covers private individuals — not corporations, funds, or financial institutions — who have suffered a financial loss in one or more of the following categories:

Investment Fraud

Losses arising from fraudulent investment schemes, unauthorised trading, or misrepresentation by brokers and platforms.

Platform Failure

Funds lost due to the collapse, insolvency, or sudden closure of a trading, crypto, or financial services platform.

Digital Asset Fraud

Losses involving cryptocurrency, NFTs, or other digital assets — including phishing, rug pulls, and exchange fraud.

Unauthorised Transactions

Funds moved or withdrawn without the claimant's knowledge or consent, including account takeovers and social engineering fraud.

Mis-sold Financial Products

Cases where financial products were sold in a misleading or inappropriate manner, resulting in documented loss.

Cross-Border Recovery

Cases spanning multiple jurisdictions where recovery requires coordinated international engagement.

There is no minimum claim amount. PIPA does not discriminate on the basis of the size of a loss, the sophistication of the claimant, or the complexity of the case. Our mandate is to provide the same standard of review to a $2,000 loss and a $2,000,000 loss.

Scope of Work

PIPA's operational scope spans 38 active jurisdictions, with reviewer expertise covering:

  • United Kingdom (FCA-regulated environment, English law)
  • European Union member states (MiFID II, GDPR, EBA frameworks)
  • United States (SEC, CFTC, and state-level regulatory environments)
  • Offshore financial centres including BVI, Cayman Islands, and Malta
  • Major Asia-Pacific jurisdictions including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australia
  • Emerging market environments and cross-border digital asset cases

Case Types by Volume (2024)

Crypto & Digital Asset Fraud38%
Unauthorised Broker / Platform Loss29%
Investment Scheme Fraud19%
Platform Insolvency / Closure9%
Other / Cross-Category5%

Internal case distribution data, Q4 2024. Subject to change.

How We Operate

PIPA operates as a non-profit organisation. This is not incidental — it is structural to how we fulfil our mandate. Because we do not generate profit from case outcomes, we have no incentive to inflate assessments, delay resolution, or favour one claimant over another.

Fee Structure

Case submission and initial review are provided at no charge. Where fees apply — for example, at the case processing or legal coordination stage — they are disclosed in advance, itemised in writing, and require explicit claimant consent before any obligation arises. Success-based contributions are applied exclusively upon confirmed receipt of recovered funds by the claimant.

Reviewer Independence

Reviewers are assigned to cases on the basis of jurisdictional expertise and case-type experience. No reviewer is assigned to a case in which they hold any commercial, personal, or financial interest. Assignments are logged and subject to internal audit.

Data & Confidentiality

All case data is treated as strictly confidential. Claimant information is not shared with third parties without explicit written consent, except where required by law. Case files are accessible only to the assigned reviewer and designated oversight personnel.

PIPA is not a regulatory authority and does not investigate or sanction financial firms. We operate in parallel with — and in support of — regulatory and legal processes, not as a substitute for them.

Limitations & Boundaries

Transparency about what PIPA cannot do is as important to us as communicating what we can. Our mandate does not extend to the following:

Legal advice or representation

PIPA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. We may identify relevant legal channels and coordinate with legal representatives, but we do not act as solicitors or counsel.

Guaranteed recovery

Submission of a claim does not guarantee any recovery of funds. Outcomes depend on the specific circumstances, available evidence, and the jurisdiction involved. We are explicit about this at every stage.

Regulatory enforcement

We do not have the authority to compel financial firms, exchanges, or platforms to return funds. We work through established regulatory and legal channels, not by direct enforcement.

Claims against solvent, regulated firms

Where a claimant has a dispute with a fully regulated, solvent firm operating within its licensed scope, we may refer them to the appropriate ombudsman or regulatory body rather than handle the case directly.

Criminal prosecution

PIPA does not conduct criminal investigations or prosecutions. Where evidence of criminal conduct is identified, we may refer the matter to the appropriate law enforcement authority.

Accountability

PIP Agency holds itself accountable to the individuals it serves through the following mechanisms:

  • Written communication at every case stage — decisions, delays, and outcomes are always documented
  • Internal case audit programme — all reviewer assignments and decisions are logged and reviewable
  • Quarterly data updates — case volumes, completion rates, and jurisdictional coverage are updated regularly
  • Annual transparency reporting — aggregated outcome data published to maintain public accountability
  • Complaints process — claimants may escalate concerns to senior oversight personnel at any stage

Questions about our mandate?

If you have questions about the scope of our work, our operating principles, or anything contained in this mandate document, write to us at support@pip-agency.com. We will respond within 3 business days.